Heat treatment for giant cell tumors of bone: A systematic review.

This systematic review evaluates the effects of heat treatments in de novo, residual and recurrent giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB). Studies were eligible for inclusion if one of the following treatments was administered: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, argon cauterization, electrocauterization and hot liquid treatment. The primary outcome was recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications, pain, function, and quality of life. Recurrence rates for microwave ablation as an adjuvant to intralesional curettage were 0%, 4% and 10% (3 retrospective single-group studies); for argon cauterization 4%, 8% and 26% (3 cohort studies); electrocauterization 0% to 33% (8 cohort studies); and hot liquid 9.5% and 24% (2 cohort studies). Follow-up was generally ≥24 months. Data on pain, function and quality of life were scarce. Complications included infection and secondary osteoarthritis. Current evidence does not demonstrate or exclude an effect of heat treatments on recurrence in GCTB. Further research should objectify if (subgroups of) patients benefit from these treatments.

Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatments for Symptomatic Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments in symptomatic adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). DESIGN: A systematic literature review. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify research published since 1988. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies were eligible if they featured symptomatic ADS patients aged ≥50 who received nonsurgical treatment. Minimum follow-up was six weeks, and outcomes of interest were pain, disability, quality of life, and Cobb angle. Evidence quality per intervention was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Six studies were included. Of these, four focused specifically on injections, bracing, or yoga; two involved multiple treatments. One RCT provided evidence for greater effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection over anesthetic alone in reducing radiating pain and disability. Two single-group retrospective cohort studies lent support for bracing to slow curve progression. One retrospective single-group cohort study suggested an association between yoga and reduced curve progression. Evidence for injections to reduce ADS symptoms was rated as low quality; evidence for bracing and yoga was rated as very low quality. No specific evidence was identified regarding other treatments, including physical therapy and analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Literature describing the effectiveness of nonoperative treatments in symptomatic ADS is scarce. The quantity and quality of the evidence regarding injections, bracing, and yoga are insufficient to advise for or against the use of these methods to improve outcomes in symptomatic ADS. For these and other nonoperative treatment forms, further research is needed.

Defining Instability in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Surgeon Views.

STUDY DESIGN: Surgeon survey. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors influencing surgeons' definition of instability in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and assess treatment preferences for both stable and unstable DS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DS treatment options are broadly classified as decompression with or without fusion. In surgical decision-making, "instability" is frequently considered as a key factor. However, no consensus on the definition of instability exists. METHODS: A survey was conducted to ascertain the minimum amounts of static translation, dynamic translation, and angulation change that surgeons considered significant for determining instability. The importance of other clinical and radiographic features were also assessed, and respondents' standard treatment for stable and unstable DS. RESULTS: Out of 226 respondents, 99% deemed dynamic translation moderately to extremely influential for determining instability, whereas only 55% found static translation as important. The most prevalent cut-off values for dynamic (57%) and static translation (32%) were at least 2-4 mm and for angulation change at least 10-15 degrees (43%). Facet angulation was considered moderately to extremely important to determine instability by 69% of the surgeons, disk height by 67%, patient age by 64%, severity of stenosis by 55%, severity of back pain by 50%, patient-reported function by 49%, pelvic incidence by 47%, and severity of neurogenic claudication by 42%.Decompression with fusion was the preferred treatment method for unstable DS in 99% of the respondents. For stable DS, 40% would still perform fusion, whereas 60% preferred treatment with decompression-alone. Those who preferred fusion for stable DS reported significantly lower thresholds for static (P<0.001) and dynamic translation (P=0.004) for their determination of instability. CONCLUSIONS: Clear consensus regarding the definition of instability does not exist. Dynamic translation is the most agreed-upon parameter of influence. Treatment preferences vary for stable DS, but for unstable cases there is broad consensus to perform fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.